Thursday 27 March 2014

1) Research News Corporation’s response to the growth of new and digital media by listing each of the institution’s brands (Sky News, Times etc.) Have any closed, changed or been in the news in the last five years for any reason?

Other news that are included are: News International, The Times, The Sun, and the News of the world (a major scandal which led to closure in July 2011.
Dow Jones & Company (an American publisher of financial news outlets, including The Wall Street Journal)
The book publisher Harper Collins and Fox Entertainment Group who are the owners of the 20th Century Fox film studio and the Fox Broadcasting Company- which are one of the US' major Television networks.

2) Develop examples of the impact that new and digital media has had on News Corp’s brands (paywalls, readership figures, audience share etc.)

on-line subscriptions/paywalls
price promotions for newspapers
impact on institutions content and its appeal
paid subscription for TV content
Quality of journalism
User Generated Content
Social Media/on-line news providers (Huff Post Ammpp3d)

Why and with what success are traditional media institutions adapting to the challenge posed by new/digital media?

Tuesday 25 March 2014

New and Digital #16

No-makeup selfies campaign generates £2m windfall for cancer research


no make up

It started with a row at the Oscars, featured the current obsession with "selfies" and rapidly clogged up legions of Facebook streams. Tens of thousands of women, egged on by their friends, shared pictures of themselves without makeup to raise awareness of breast cancer.
By Friday the viral trend had transformed into a fundraising phenomenon, generating a £2m windfall for Cancer Research UK.
The #nomakeupselfies campaign raised the money in just 48 hours, the charity said, with hundreds of thousands of donations from Facebook, Instagram and Twitter users sharing pictures of themselves without makeup and nominating a friend to do the same.
Cancer Research UK said it had not initiated this particular campaign, but was alerted to the #nomakeupselfies trend on Tuesday and began to ask users to add a donation request and text code to their posts. Since then, the money has flooded into the UK charity.
Cancer Research UK's head of social media, Aaron Eccles, said: "We're over the moon. When we do a social media campaign we want to engage as many people as possible, and this has taken off like crazy."
The idea itself appears to have begun last week when American crime author Laura Lippman tweeted a picture of herself without makeup in support of Kim Novak, the 81-year-old actor whose looks had been criticised at the Oscars. The theme was picked up by celebrities and fans of Lippman before spreading more widely.
But for all the unexpected financial success, some commentators question whether it is appropriate or relevant to link the "bravery" of appearing without makeup to the very different challenge of fighting cancer, triggering fierce debates online.
Blogger Yomi Adegoke said: "Thinly veiling vanity as philanthropy more than irks … the pretence these images are for anything other than an onslaught of 'natural beauty' acclamations, coupled with pats on the back for 'fighting the cause' makes the no makeup selfie mania even harder to stomach."
At some point, all the criticism prompted people to remember and then resurrect a previous failed social media campaign – where Cancer Research UK had attempted unsuccessfully to use selfies to raise awareness of breast cancer.
6. 16/01/14- 
14. 17/03/14- 

Monday 24 March 2014

Developments in new/digital media mean that audiences can now have access to a greater variety of views and values. To what extent are audiences empowered by these developments?

To a certain extent audiences are empowered by these developments due to the fact that new/digital media has been accessed greatly by millions of people around the globe. Due to this people are able to have access to greater variety of views and values, and decide their opinions by looking at not one but several details. For example, the latest event of the missing Malaysian Plane has been going on for a long time and majority of the people are clueless. But when they want to be updated they look at the internet straight away, however they can make their minds up to what they’ll believe. For example, one site says the aliens have taken the plane, another says the pilot has done this on purpose and others saying it’s in the middle of the ocean near Australia. Look at different pages people have the option from looking at the variety of news and making up their views and values based on the diverse news pages they’ve identified.

As a result, audiences globally are able to access more texts and web.20 is continuing to grow. Web 2.0 allows audiences to become producers of the media texts. As a result of audiences being able to produce several media texts, they’re able to promote their own views and values. There are several of types of ways audiences do so such as creating their own blogs. An example of this is, Media Mcguffin where we are able to blog our work and become producers of our own media text. This supports Pluralism, as this is a society of competing groups and interests; none of them are predominant which means to present as the strongest elements. Therefore to a certain extent this goes for new/digital media. Audiences have been empowered by the capability to challenge organisations and get the truth out of circumstances where it wouldn’t necessarily been known to the public. Which Briggs and Burke state “The most important medium of the twentieth century”. A fine example of this is the ‘Arab Spring’ which was the revolutionary of protests, riots and civil wars in the Arab.  This is where North African countries fought to show the world how bad their governments where.

Media organisations are seen as enjoying an important degree of autonomy from the state, political parties and institutionalized pressure groups. Control of the media is in the hands of autonomous managerial elite who allow a considerable degree of flexibility to media professionals. It’s seen between media institutions and their audiences, as McQuail stated ‘the relationship is generally entered into voluntarily and on apparently equal terms.. and audience are seen as capable of manipulating the meida in an infinite variety of ways according to their prior needs and dispositions.’ This links with how audiences have been empowered by the capability to challenge organisations and get the truth out of circumstances where it wouldn’t be known to the public is Ian Tomlinson’s death.  This was said to believe in the eyes of the public that he died due to him collapsing and the first aiders not being able to help him. But the truth was that he was actually hit by a police officer and due to the hit he suffered a heart attack. The family have only been able to seek justice due to UGC from the audience’s. Therefore, this favours greatly McQuail’s statement as audiences are using the new/digital media to prior their needs and dispositions.

In contrast, Marxists view capitalist society as being one of class domination; the media are seen to promote hegemonic ideology and ensure the dominance of certain classes. Audiences still produce texts, but only with a certain view and the fact that they imitate media texts of the traditional media. This supports Marxists view as it basically suggests that he wants to emphasize the role of the mass media and keep the current power structure in the society as they are and not change it. Therefore, the world has to accept it as ‘common sense’ and ‘natural’.  As Marxists would argue user-generate comment creates an illusion that we have a free opinion. But our opinion is influenced and manipulated through varies of news content. Therefore, the audience are empowered by these developments. Paerto’s law states that “a minority of media producers always serve a majority of consumers”. This is evident as the social networking sites such as- YouTube allows users to create their own channels. Youtube home page consists of various channels with artists such as  Beyonce, Justin Bieber and Rhianna. Artists are only using these sites as a promotional vehicle. As, for example Justin Bieber was releasing his album in two months. But before this he was letting out a song every single week on YouTube to promote his album. Initially when the songs were over people would be obliged to buy the whole album. Marxists view was that the media have dumed down their output. As the views on youtube are for traditional media, as audiences are able to catch up on television.  ‘Burgess and Green’ say from the book of digital media that there are 2 Youtubes 1, a space where thse two categories which are traditional media and home video collide, but isn’t really coverage. The way media texts are being consumed are changing but people are still consuming some of the same traditional media without being aware.


To conclude, I strongly believe that there is a wide extent that the developments in new/digital media have a greater access to varieties of views and values. As new and digital media have provided loads of opportunities for businesses, people and celebrities to promote their act/field/video in social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and MySpace. However, things such as citizen journalism is impacting the way audiences have access as it’s challenging the professional journalists. As, when an event occurs you need to be at the best time and right place in order to witness and video it. That is then showed to millions through sites such as YouTube. James Murdoch said “The expansion of state-sponsored journalism is a threat to the plurality and independence of news provision”. Which also relates to Marxists view. This allows audiences to innovate. As they’re able to publich whatever the want through their device. Therefore media institutions have to reconsider the information delivered to audiences with the aid of e-media platform. Such as social networking sites as it can help update information and audiences have varied sources of information they can choose from. Rather than relying on traditional media forms such as the newspapers. As Rupert Murdoch stated, “The world is changing and newspapers have to adapt.”

Thursday 20 March 2014

Globalisation and News

1)      Is our news influenced by American Cultural imperialism? Yes. CNN was the first news cable to feature news for 24 hours 7 days a week. Making it easier for audience to decide what time of day/night they’d prefer to watch the news. For example, when the 9/11 happened there were consistent live updates on where the planes were and the building collapsing which was the highest. Sky in the UK identified that CNN were doing 24 hours news and copied CNN. Even so much so from the two websites Sky has copied CNN’s layout which is completely the same. In Today’s world the way we watch channels on TV has become more so American. They’re a very powerful country and people develop their ideas because usually they’re the first ones to come up with it.

2)       Has the increase globalisation of news improved the audience experience? How? Why?
Yes. The audiences are able to view live footage and experience it more so real. For an example, they are able to witness the disasters that are happening around the world. This improves the way audiences identify things. Moreover, the news generate at a much faster speed. With a great amount of choice to choose from for the audiences. However, the negative element to this is globalisation means that it’s less likely to make it local. It can also bias the audience’s views and choices. However, the choices may disappoint some of the audiences as they may not want to consistently see the news as a mainstream element. With wanting to know what Is happening in a local perspective.

3)      Has globalisation benefited or damaged major news institutions? How? Why? Yes. It has both damaged and benefited major news institutions. Firstly, it has benefited it as with different institutions there are a wide range of journalists in every inch of the country. Therefore, it makes it easier for institutions and less costly as they wouldn’t need journalists worldwide as it’s globalised on a big scale. It’s damaged due to the fact that News organisations at time plagiarize sites. Also, for news institutions its harder to sand out in a global market.  

Monday 17 March 2014

New and Digital Media #15

TV viewing figures show Brits prefer traditional sets over smartphones

Watching TV




Average viewer watched three hours and 55 minutes of TV a day in 2013, but only three minutes on mobile devices, figures reveal. Predictions of the death of living room TVs continue to be wide of the mark with 98.5% of average daily viewing done via traditional sets.It appears it will be some time before the explosion in smartphones andtablet computers revolutionises TV viewing, with the average Briton watching little more than three minutes a day on mobile devices last year, according to industry figures.
The average UK viewer watched a total of three hours and 55 minutes of TV a day last year.This was a nine minute year-on-year drop, due in part to a comparison with the hugely popular London 2012 Olympics the previous year.The figures show that predictions of the death of the living room TV continue to be well wide of the mark with 98.5% of average daily viewing – three hours and 52 minutes of the total – done via the traditional set.Mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets and laptops accounted for an average of just three minutes 30 seconds a day, 1.5% of the total, which equates to just over three half-hour TV shows a month. This is up 30 seconds a day on average compared with 2012.
"New screens are making TV even more convenient for viewers and creating new opportunities for advertisers. But, the more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the TV set will remain our favourite way to watch TV – especially as on-demand services become more available on the best screen." When programmes and shows are on most people are unable to view it due to them having a busy schedule such as going work and busy with other activities. Therefore, on the mobile and laptops the most popular type of watching was on-demand and catch up programming on services such as the BBC, iPlayer, ITV player, Sky Go and 40D- with only a few live TV. Thinkbox believes the rise of internet-connected TV sets could limit growth in viewing on "non-TV set devices" – such as tablets – as more households are able to access on-demand services via their main television set.
The proportion of television watched live at home continued to fall, from 89.9% of all viewing in 2012 to 88.7% last year, reflecting the growth in popularity of digital television recorders such as Sky+, Freeview+ and Tivo on Virgin Media.

New and Digital Media #14

Brit Awards was most tweeted about television show in UK

ITV show notched up 4.17m Twitter comments with One Direction's Harry Styles getting 155,000 retweets
One Direction
This year's Brits has set the record as the most tweeted about television show in the UK, while the TV audience for the music awards event slumped to its lowest level since 2006.The ITV show notched up 4.17m tweets – easily beating previous record holder last year's Comic Relief, which drew 1.5m  as the decision to allow fans to vote via Twitter for the first time proved a social media publicity master-stroke. This shows how inviting a social media and allowing audiences to become more involved, there becomes a word-of-mouth awareness of the show which would influence people who normally don't watch it to view it. 
There were 2m tweets about the first awards Twitter vote, for the best British video, with One Direction's Harry Styles the king of retweets notching up 155,000 for a post thanking fans for voting. Unsurprisingly, One Direction took home the award for best British video.There were about 2.17m tweets about the show itself, which alone is enough to make the Brit Awards 2014 the most tweeted about UK TV programme. Last year's event generated 1.5m tweets.
"The live, public and conversational nature of Twitter also makes it the perfect accompaniment to TV," said Twitter in a blogpost the show based on statistics from analytics firm SecondSync. "Fans come together on the world's biggest sofa and share TV moments like the Brits with fans across the globe".

The show set  new tweets-per-minute record for a UK TV show of 78,000, with Beyonce proving to be the most talked about performer of the night on Twitter.There was less to cheer about on the live TV front with ITV's coverage, hosted by James Corden for the fourth year in a row, slumping to its lowest level since 2006.
The show attracted an average of 4.6 million viewers between 8pm and 10.15pm, an 18.4% share of all viewing in the time slot, well down on last year's 6.5 million. This shows how celebrity enforcement can influence a mass-audience significantly and due to the fact of there being internet available such as social-netowrking sites. It encourages fans to interact more allowing user-generate-comments. When tweets are read aloud in the show it encourages more people to tweet more about the show itself, as a result of them being the most talked about show on twitter.  

New and Digital media #13

The new social entrepreneurs: young and improving the world

Solving social problems rather than getting rich is the priority for tomorrow's ambitious entrepreneurs
graduates seaNew horizons: social change is the primary driver for many young people. Photograph: Alamy
Technology has levelled the playing field, opening up remarkable opportunities for young people. According to a Populus survey, more than a quarter of 16- to 25-year-olds want to set up their own business, and 14% are in the process of doing so, compared with 8% only a year ago.
But there is something else at play here, another trend emerging. For many of these new digital entrepreneurs, the primary objective is to improve the world rather than their own bank balance. They are looking for radical solutions to social problems rather than creating a product or service that will make them a stash of cash.
That doesn't mean their aims are any less ambitious. Take 22-year-old Aaron Jones, whose goal is universal access to education. He has set up the multi-award winning Fikay, a lifestyle brand all about successful living and giving. It produces fashion accessories using recycled cement bags, employs co-operatives and members of fair-trade organisations and, for every purchase made, Fikay donates to educational building projects in south east Asia.
Fikay has already helped to build one school in Cambodia with plans for many more to follow. "Why," says Aaron, "do some children have the right to an education while others don't? Fikay is my adventure and mission to change this."
A new generation of digital makers is heavily emerging, but more exciting is the fact that a lot of young people are using their digital skills to tackle social challenges such as education, healthcare, human rights and social isolation. Currently new social technology entrepreneurs are about action instead of talk, as there are offers by apps for good. which provides support for young people who want to design apps that will improve their world. Such as the person who invented Flappy bird which went viral worldwide. The digital technology is the most powerful technology up to date, and the future will consists of people tackling complex social challenges. 

Monday 10 March 2014

Q2: Why are media products that represent outsiders, such as vampire films, so popular? You may also refer to other media products to support your answer. To begin with, with both The Twilight and Let the right one in outsiders don't fit in with these type of people and if someone who doesn't feel fit in feels excluded. This is due to Let the right one in being a foreign film us as British English viewers don't have the understanding of the specific language they are speaking in this very fact enables us to feel excluded and drives us to concentrate on the subtitles itself. There are diverse stereotypes for people that don't fit in one of which the theorist perkins spoke about justifying how these stereotypes are infact a positive outlook. This creates an audience appeal and hence why vampire films are possibly so popular. This also ties in the fact that famous actors such as Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson who are huge artists in the film industry feature in these type of films encourage the audience to watch the films. In addition, as the Twilight was book based it already has a huge fan base which creating word-of-mouth entices more people to watch the film. The outsider character in the vampire genre has been so much so popular in recent years, so due to this producers remake them due to there being a less of a risk than something completely new. Producers capitalise on an already popular and profitable genres and representations. This links to Marxist ideas of exploiting audience for profit. 

Other media products that tie in nicely with these 2 media films are firstly DR. Who from the BBC which has been running successfully for nearly more than 10 years this creates a sense of escapism for the audience which is from Users and Gratification theory Kats and blumer's. Moreover, there is a sense of personal identity where these type of fans or audience's see themselves related on the screen. Another media product is Spiderman which has a weak yet powerful appeal to the audience as it's: unknown, mysterious, different and cool. Which is why these type of films encourage younger to older broader audience's to watch these types of films which make media products that are represented as outsiders even more popular. Outsider characters can sometimes offer more alternative representations of men, women or youth. The media is guilty of stereotyping many groups, so audiences enjoy media products that offer alternative representations. However they can also reinforce stereotypes and demonise particular groups by focusing so much on

problems, defining groups negatively by their social problems.

1) How many of the examiner's points did you manage to cover in your answers?


For the first question, I analysed both of the media products, I understood the concept in the perspective on the narrative enigma. Moreover, I included forms which are the media language, narrative, representations a bit of institution, audience and values. 
2) How many examples did you provide in your answers that did not come from classwork and What will you do between now and the exam in June to ensure you have a wide variety of examples to refer to in questions two and three?
I used various of answers that didn't come from classwork as it was either films I viewed at home or my own knowledge I used with least usage of classwork answers. Between now and the exam in June I want to ensure to research A2 key terminology so I get used to the fact that I need to use this consistently. And remain up to date with with all of the theories, I will therefore make notes and posters at home so I'm aware of the representation theories, audience theories etc. Moreover, I want to do past papers and look at the mark scheme afterwards so I am able to understand how to answer these type of style questions. Therefore, doing so I'll be able to link with a variety of wider context when referring it to other media products. 


For the second question, I evaluated it using media issues and theories. However, I didn't manage to provide enough debates to provide a solid evaluation. I did support my answer with 1 media product, (Harry Potter) however to get higher marks I should have added a range of examples from other relevant media products. 
For the third question it was my weakest as I didn't support the answers and use a range of examples from other relevant media products. 


Sunday 9 March 2014

New and Digital Media #12

10 years time: Social media and the future of fundraising

social media connecting people


In 10 years' time social media will have been around for 30 or so years. Online communities began in the mid-90s and blogging a little later. Accessing sites like Facebook and Myspace in the office was frowned upon in those early days and most IT policies had strict restrictions forbidding what were then deemed non-work-related activities. People tended to hide behind avatars and nicknames on social media rather than being themselves.
Since that time, only a few short years ago, the growth both in usage and functionality has been extraordinary.
Social media is now far more firmly embedded in daily life with people far more likely to post using their real name and personal profile. Today it is individuals rather than brands that are playing a strong role in building influence and many charities actively encourage their staff to engage onTwitter and Facebook as they've realised the potential.This erosion of boundaries between professional and personal has implications for how teams will be managed and structured, particularly those teams that communicate externally with service users and supporters. Everyone's a spokesperson now, so give them the tools to be a good one!
this shows the online impact in the coming years, how charities will have to find the flexibility and nimbleness to use the tools that are available, get better at sharing the video contents which would raise a very high awareness. As people in a decade will definitely be more immune to using technology. The 'service delivery' charities today have been using technology such as Skype to deliver services online. In a decade this will grow very higher and will have a huge effect as charities will be able to reach more people, regionally and nationally. Social media is very useful for raising awareness. Especially as the fact that the social networking site are typically noisy and in a sense crowded. 

Thursday 6 March 2014

News Values

How has the new and digital media technology changed Galtung and Ruge's news values? How would you update them for 2014.

Immediacy is more important than ever due to news breaking on Twitter or elsewhere on-line. However, this in turn changes the approach of other news sources such as newspapers as the news will probably already be broken by the time the paper is published so different angles might be required. 

Familiarity: is it culturally close to us in Britain is fairly important as when people watch the news today and something happens near our area it can affect us as this is the country where it affects us.  Perhaps for 2014 it's vital that if it's to make news it's something big that's happened in our country. Such as a bombing, otherwise other people won't pick up the newspaper and read it. Therefore using big images will attract the mass audience to pick up and read the newspaper.

Amplitude: is it a big event or one which involves large numbers of people is relevant today as if many people have been impacted it would attract the audience. But in order for the audience to pick it up it's important that the newspaper have the latest news such as showing big close-ups of the latest event and having there correspondent there to witness the huge event. This would entice the audience to pick up and read the newspaper. 

Frequency: did the event happen fairly quickly this is fairly vital as if the news happens very quickly the first who are usually aware of this event is sites such as social networking. Therefore, it's important for newspapers to respond very quickly and interview 'citizen journalists' who have witnessed the scene. As viewers would be interested in knowing and hearing what the person who witnessed it stated.

Unambiguity: is it clear and definite, if its not clear and definite people will be immune to becoming very annoyed. They'll feel like they can't trust the newspaper at all as they encountered false information. Therefore they'd be more tempted to see what happens on websites such as: BBC News. Therefore the newspapers should make sure that whatever there journalists research and publish, it's accurate and valid information for the audience base- otherwise this can result into a loss of an audience. The newspaper is already not doing well anyway so they can't afford for this to take place.

Predictability: did we expect it to happen, if an event is going on that the public are aware about such as the wedding of Kate Middleton & Prince Harry. The newspapers may not be able to keep updated information of the wedding therefore audience's would turn to the TV. However, the newspapers can keep closure on the event and perhaps print out the paper as soon as possible.

Surprise: is it a rare or unexpected, newspapers can have big close-ups and point of view shot on stories that are unexpected such as being on Page1. This would entice the audience to read it more so and encourage them to purchase the newspaper daily. 

Continuity: has this story already been defined as news, this may have been the case in a sense of urgency due to variety of social networking sites. Therefore, newspapers can define the news in a very different way. Perhaps if an ongoing news story has been made very popular, newspapers can show case it in a different perspective to get the audience engaged.

Elite nations and people: which country has the event happened in? Does the story concern well-known people? The newspapers should in general focus on Well known people mainly newspapers, such as common and well-known celebrities. This would encourage a mass-audience to read the newspapers in depth and continue being regular audience for newspapers who focus on this.

Negativity: is it bad news? if this news has been portrayed negatively it would affect a lot of people so newspapers should include this inside the pages. Instead of the front page.

Balance: the story may be selected to balance other news, such as a human survival story to balance a number of stories concerning death.